Abstract
The distinction between needs and wants represents one of the most fundamental ethical and economic questions facing humanity, with profound implications for individual well-being, social justice, and environmental sustainability. This comprehensive academic inquiry examines the Buddhist perspective on needs and wants through systematic analysis of canonical texts, commentarial literature, and contemporary scholarly discourse on Buddhist economics. The investigation reveals that Buddhism offers a sophisticated framework for understanding the relationship between material necessities, desires, and human flourishing that differs fundamentally from mainstream economic assumptions. While conventional economics treats human desires as value-neutral and unlimited, Buddhism distinguishes between wholesome desires (chanda) rooted in wisdom and unwholesome craving (tanha) rooted in ignorance. The analysis examines the Buddha's teachings on the four basic requisites of monastic life, the guidance for lay practitioners on wealth management and consumption, and the contrast between material accumulation and spiritual liberation as illustrated in the Dhaniya Sutta. The article engages with the growing field of Buddhist economics, which proposes that true well-being is achieved not through the unlimited satisfaction of wants but through the simplification of desires and the cultivation of contentment. The study proposes that the Buddhist perspective on needs and wants offers a viable alternative to the consumerist paradigm, addressing contemporary challenges of resource depletion, inequality, and ecological degradation while providing a path to genuine human flourishing.
1. Introduction
"Here in this world we can find everything for our NEEDS but not for our GREED" and "fewer the NEEDS greater HAPPINESS." These profound words of Mahatma Gandhi capture the essence of a timeless wisdom that has been articulated across civilizations and spiritual traditions. The question of what constitutes a genuine human need versus a mere want lies at the heart of economic ethics, environmental sustainability, and individual well-being. In an age of unprecedented material abundance accompanied by persistent inequality, ecological degradation, and widespread dissatisfaction, this question has become more urgent than ever.
The Buddha clearly explained the cause of needs through his excellent Dhamma teachings, which were planted with compassion. Ancient people had very few needs, and they were happy with what they received. At the beginning, people who came to this world from the Abhassara Brahma World had a very easy life. The plants bore fruit on the same day after people plucked grains from them in the morning. Those grains also were very soft and sweet. They did not have husks and could be eaten directly. This mythological account, found in the Aggañña Sutta of the Digha Nikaya, illustrates the Buddhist understanding that simplicity and contentment are the natural condition of humanity, while craving and accumulation are later developments.
One important idea in economics is the distinction between "needs and wants." Needs would be defined as goods or services that are required, including the needs for food, clothing, shelter, and health care. Wants are goods or services that are not necessary but that we desire or wish for. For example, one person needs clothes, but one person may not need designer clothes. In the same manner, one person does not need toys, entertainment, games, and so on. One person needs food but does not have to have steak or dessert. One does not need glamorous trips, mall shopping, and so on. This article will explore the Buddhist perspective on this fundamental distinction, drawing on canonical texts, commentarial literature, and contemporary scholarship.
The significance of this inquiry extends beyond academic interest. As one scholar observes, "Buddhist economics urges individuals not to multiply human desires but to simplify them to be closer to the minimum material comfort, which includes enough food, clothing, shelter, and medicine" . In a consumerist economic system, wanting less would bring substantial benefits for the person, for the community, and for nature as a whole. The Buddhist perspective therefore offers a viable alternative to the consumerist paradigm that dominates contemporary economic thought and practice.
This article undertakes a comprehensive examination of the Buddhist perspective on needs and wants, proceeding through several interconnected dimensions of analysis. It begins with an economic definition of needs and wants, establishing the conceptual framework for the subsequent analysis. It then provides a detailed description of needs and wants, exploring their characteristics and significance in human life. The analysis examines the differences between needs and wants, clarifying the criteria that distinguish the two categories. The investigation then turns to the Buddhist perspective, examining the teachings of the Buddha on basic requisites, the cultivation of contentment, and the distinction between wholesome and unwholesome desires. The article engages with the Dhaniya Sutta as a case study, exploring the contrast between material accumulation and spiritual liberation. Finally, the article concludes with a synthesis of the findings and their implications for contemporary economic and ethical thought.
2. Economic Definition of Needs and Wants
2.1 The Economic Framework
In economics, there are unfulfilled desires that motivate human behavior to make themselves more comfortable. It includes both physiological or biological requirements for maintaining life (needs) and the psychological desires that make life more enjoyable (wants). However, when push comes to pull, it matters very little to markets if people need goods or want goods, so long as they are motivated to buy the goods to satisfy their wants and needs.
Unsatisfied human desires motivate their actions and improve their achievement when met. Many business marketing departments pay close attention to the needs and wants of their target market since both drive buyer purchases. These can be further described as those needs that are based on biological necessities and those wants that make life more pleasant and which largely depend on psychological factors. As one scholarly analysis notes, "In traditional economics, especially in mainstream Neoclassical economics, human desires are treated as value-free" . This value-neutral treatment of desires is a fundamental assumption of mainstream economics that Buddhism challenges.
2.2 The Problem of Unlimited Wants
The economic framework typically assumes that human wants are unlimited. As one scholar explains, "The human wants are unlimited. Thus, the satisfaction of one want leads to another." This assumption of unlimited wants underlies the economic imperative for continuous growth, as economies must constantly expand to satisfy ever-increasing desires.
However, this assumption has significant implications for both individual well-being and environmental sustainability. The pursuit of unlimited wants leads to constant dissatisfaction, as no amount of consumption can permanently satisfy desire. It also leads to resource depletion and ecological degradation, as the natural world cannot sustain unlimited growth in consumption.
Mahatma Gandhi captured this problem in his observation that "Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed." This insight has been echoed by Buddhist thinkers and contemporary economists concerned with sustainability. As one scholar observes, "If human attempts to alleviate an intense need, that need will eventually turn into lust. If man only satisfies one's desire (lust), then one cannot solve economic problems because of lust" .
### 2.3 The Distinction Between Needs and Wants in Economics
The distinction between needs and wants is fundamental to economic analysis. A need is something that is necessary for survival, such as clothes, food, shelter, and medicine. These are the basic needs of all human beings. A want is something that is desired but not necessary for survival.
The difference between needs and wants is simple. A need is something you have to have, while a want is something you would like to have. Economists commonly use the concepts of needs and wants to describe human situations. A "need" is fundamental for a human for survival purposes. On the other hand, a "want" can be seen as a human desire to get something additional whenever they have already satisfied their rising needs.
As one analysis explains, "A need is something that is necessary for survival, such as Clothes, food, shelter, and medicine. These are the basic needs of all human beings." This distinction is crucial for understanding the Buddhist perspective, which emphasizes the satisfaction of genuine needs while minimizing attachment to unnecessary wants.
3. Description of Needs and Wants
3.1 The Nature of Human Needs
The ideas of want and need can be examined from many perspectives. In lay society, want might be considered similar to emotional desire, which can be studied scientifically through the disciplines of psychology or sociology. In economics, a want is something that is desired. It is said that every person has unlimited wants but limited resources. Thus, people cannot have everything they want and must look for the most affordable replacements.
Wants are often distinguished from needs. A need is something that is necessary for survival, such as clothes, food, shelter, and medicine. These are the basic needs of all human beings. The Buddhist tradition similarly identifies basic requisites for human life. In the Vinaya Pitaka, the Buddha instructed monks to depend on four basic requisites and use them mindfully for the goal of ending all suffering.
Contemporary scholars have expanded on the concept of basic needs. As one analysis notes, "A need is something that is necessary for survival, such as Clothes, food, shelter, and medicine. These are the basic needs of all human beings." The distinction between needs and wants is essential for understanding the Buddhist emphasis on contentment and simplicity.
3.2 The Nature of Human Wants
Wants are goods or services that are not necessary but that we desire or wish for. For example, one person needs clothes, but one person may not need designer clothes. One person does not need toys, entertainment, games, and so on. One person needs food but does not have to have steak or dessert. One does not need glamorous trips, mall shopping, and so on.
Wants are often driven by psychological and social factors rather than genuine necessity. As the Dhammapada states, "There is no river like craving." This insight captures the Buddhist understanding that wants are driven by tanha (craving), which is the root cause of suffering.
The distinction between needs and wants is not always clear-cut in practice. What begins as a want can become a need in certain circumstances. The Buddhist perspective encourages practitioners to examine their desires carefully and distinguish between what is genuinely necessary for well-being and what is merely driven by craving.
3.3 The Role of Contentment
The Buddhist tradition places significant emphasis on contentment. As the Karaniya Metta Sutta states, the wise person is "Santussako ca subharo ca" - contented and easy to support. This quality of contentment is essential for distinguishing between needs and wants.
When one is contented, one does not feel the constant pressure to acquire more. As one scholar explains, "Buddhism recommends moderate consumption and directly aims at changing one's preferences through meditation, analysis, and moral reflection" . This transformation of preferences is central to the Buddhist approach to needs and wants.
Ven. Dhammavijaya, in his book on Buddhist Economics, emphasizes that "There is no river like craving." This statement captures the Buddhist understanding that craving is the source of constant dissatisfaction. The path to well-being lies not in satisfying every desire but in reducing craving itself.
4. Differences Between Needs and Wants
4.1 Essential vs. Non-Essential
The primary difference between needs and wants is the distinction between essential and non-essential goods and services. Needs are essential for survival and basic well-being. Wants are non-essential, making life more comfortable but not strictly necessary.
A need is something you have to have, while a want is something you would like to have. This simple distinction is fundamental to economic analysis and Buddhist ethics. Food, clothing, shelter, and medicine are needs. Designer clothes, luxury foods, entertainment, and travel are wants.
4.2 Biological vs. Psychological Basis
Needs are typically based on biological necessities, while wants are largely dependent on psychological factors. The biological basis of needs reflects the physical requirements for survival and health. The psychological basis of wants reflects desires for pleasure, status, comfort, and novelty.
As one analysis explains, "The ideas of want and need can be examined from many perspectives. In the lay society, want might be considered similar to the emotional desire, which can be studied scientifically through the disciplines of psychology or sociology."
This distinction is important for understanding the Buddhist perspective. While biological needs must be satisfied for survival, psychological wants are not necessary for well-being and can be reduced through mental cultivation.
4.3 Fixed vs. Unlimited
Needs are relatively fixed and finite. Once basic needs are satisfied, additional goods and services do not contribute to survival. Wants, by contrast, are unlimited. The satisfaction of one want typically leads to the emergence of another want.
As one scholar explains, "The human wants are unlimited. Thus, the satisfaction of one want leads to another." This unlimited nature of wants is a key driver of economic growth and consumer culture.
The Buddhist perspective challenges the assumption that unlimited wants should be satisfied. Instead, Buddhism advocates for the simplification of desires and the cultivation of contentment with what is sufficient.
4.4 Universal vs. Particular
Needs are universal. All human beings require food, clothing, shelter, and healthcare. Wants are particular and culturally specific. What is considered a want in one culture may be considered a need in another.
This distinction has important implications for economic ethics and policy. The universal nature of needs suggests that meeting basic needs should be a priority for any society. The particular nature of wants suggests that desires for luxury and status should not be the focus of economic policy.
The Buddhist perspective emphasizes the universal nature of needs while questioning the value of culturally conditioned wants. By focusing on what is genuinely necessary for all beings, Buddhism provides a framework for universal ethics and social justice.
5. The Buddhist Perspective Towards Needs and Wants
5.1 The Four Basic Requisites
Buddhist monastic life is structured around the four basic requisites necessary for survival. In the Vinaya Pitaka, the Buddha instructed monks to depend on these requisites and use them mindfully for the goal of ending all suffering:
"Anujānāmi, bhikkhave, upasampādentena cattāro nissāye ācikkhituṃ:
01. Piṇḍiyālopa bhojanaṃ nissāya pabbajjā
02. Paṃsukūla cīvaraṃ nissāya pabbajjā
03. Rukkhamūlen āsanaṃ nissāya pabbajjā
04. Pūtimutta bhesajjaṃ nissāya pabbajjā"
"I allow, monks, that one who is giving the higher ordination should explain the four resources: going forth dependent on almsfood, going forth dependent on dust-heap robes, going forth dependent on dwelling at the foot of a tree, going forth dependent on fermented urine as medicine."
These four requisites represent the minimum material conditions necessary for a monk to maintain the body while pursuing the goal of liberation. They are the needs of monastic life, stripped of all unnecessary wants.
The Karaniya Metta Sutta also emphasizes the quality of contentment: "Santussako ca subharo ca" - contented and easily supported. The Buddha told us to live simply with the quality of "Appicchatā" (having few desires). As one scholar observes, "Buddhism recommends moderate consumption and directly aims at changing one's preferences through meditation, analysis, and moral reflection" .
5.2 The Distinction Between Chanda and Tanha
Buddhist philosophy distinguishes between two types of desire: chanda (wholesome desire) and tanha (unwholesome craving). As one scholarly analysis explains, "In Buddhism, human desires are recognized as two different kinds of desire: tanha, the desire for pleasure and chanda, the desire for true well-being. Tanha is based on ignorance, while chanda is based on wisdom" .
Chanda is a desire for what is genuinely good and beneficial. It motivates the pursuit of wisdom, compassion, and liberation. Chanda is not inherently problematic and can be cultivated as a motivation for spiritual practice.
Tanha, by contrast, is a craving for sensual pleasure and existence. It is based on ignorance about the true nature of reality and leads to suffering. Tanha is the root cause of dukkha, as expressed in the Second Noble Truth.
This distinction is crucial for understanding the Buddhist perspective on needs and wants. The need for food, clothing, shelter, and medicine can be met through chanda when approached with the right intention. Wants, however, are often driven by tanha and should be minimized.
5.3 The Kula Sutta and the Preservation of Wealth
The Kula Sutta of the Anguttara Nikaya provides practical guidance on how to preserve wealth and maintain well-being. The Buddha states that a family can hold onto its great wealth for long for four reasons:
1. They look for things that are lost.
2. They repair things that have gotten old.
3. They are moderate in consuming food and drink.
4. They have a virtuous, principled woman or man in the position of authority.
This teaching emphasizes the importance of careful stewardship, moderation in consumption, and ethical leadership. It provides practical guidance for householders on how to balance material well-being with spiritual development.
The Kula Sutta's emphasis on moderation in consumption is particularly relevant to the distinction between needs and wants. By being moderate in consuming food and drink, individuals can satisfy their needs without indulging in excessive wants.
5.4 The Sigalovada Sutta and Wealth Management
The Sigalovada Sutta, often referred to as the layperson's code of discipline, provides comprehensive guidance on wealth management. The Buddha advised lay disciples to allocate their income for living expenses, capital for running business, savings, and giving.
As one analysis explains, "According to the Sigālovāda Sutta, the Buddha once advised his lay disciples to allocate their income for living expenses, capital for running business, savings, and giving. Therefore, in a broad sense, the Buddhist way of money management involves proper allocation of income, including increasing sources of income as well as reducing expenses" .
The Sigalovada Sutta encourages lay practitioners to earn a living ethically and use their wealth wisely. It discourages excessive accumulation and encourages generosity. This teaching helps practitioners distinguish between what they genuinely need and what they merely want.
5.5 The Dhaniya Sutta: A Case Study
The Dhaniya Sutta of the Suttanipata provides a powerful illustration of the Buddhist perspective on needs and wants through a dialogue between the Buddha and Dhaniya the cattleman.
Dhaniya, a wealthy cattleman, describes his material prosperity with pride:
"Pakkodano duddhakhiro hamasmi,
Anutiire mahiyā samānavāso,
Channā kuti āhito gini,
Atha ce patthayasi pavassa deva."
"The rice is cooked, my milking done,
I live with my people along the banks of the Mahi;
my hut is roofed, my fire lit:
so if you want, rain-god, go ahead and rain."
Dhaniya rejoices in his material possessions, believing that they provide security and happiness. However, the Buddha responds by describing his own state of complete non-attachment:
"Akkodhano vigatakhilo hamasmi,
Anutiire mahiyekarattivaaso,
Vivatā kuti nibbuto gini,
Atha ce patthāyasi pavassa deva."
"Free from anger, my stubbornness gone,
I live for one night along the banks of the Mahi;
my hut's roof is open, my fire out:
so if you want, rain-god, go ahead and rain."
The Buddha declares that he has nothing, yet he is completely content. As one commentary explains, the Buddha "rejoicing in the fact that he has got nothing" while Dhaniya "rejoicing in the fact that he has got everything" . The contrast illustrates the Buddhist understanding that true happiness comes not from material accumulation but from the absence of craving.
As one analysis notes, "The elegant dialogue between Dhaniya and Buddha Gotama is expressed mostly in metaphorical language, which enhances the literary art of the sutta" . The commentator explains that the "barren cows" (vasā) refer to mental prepossession, "sucking calves" (dhenupā) to craving for rebirth, and the "strong bull lord over the cows" refers to consciousness for doing a work. The Buddha, having attained Nibbana, is content even without the causes of happiness that Dhaniya values so highly.
5.6 The Cula-tanhaskkhaya Sutta: The Destruction of Craving
The Cula-tanhaskkhaya Sutta (The Shorter Discourse on the Destruction of Craving) provides further insight into the Buddhist perspective on needs and wants. In this sutta, Sakka, the king of gods, asks the Buddha how a monk is liberated by the destruction of craving.
The Buddha responds with a simple but profound teaching: "Sabbe dhammā nālaṃ abhinivesāya" - "All things are not worth clinging to." The Buddha then explains a three-step process for letting go of craving:
1. Direct knowledge (abhijānāti): Recognize the presence of phenomena without judgment.
2. Full understanding (parijānāti): Penetrate the surface to see the true nature of phenomena as impermanent.
3. Observe feeling (vedanā): Observe feelings without grasping at pleasant feelings or pushing away unpleasant ones.
This teaching provides a practical method for distinguishing between needs and wants. By examining desires mindfully, practitioners can recognize which desires are based on genuine need and which are driven by craving.
As one commentary explains, "The greatest mistake of life is not that we have these things... The mistake is that we 'delude' ourselves into thinking they will last forever, and we 'cling' to them as if they are us" . This insight is crucial for understanding the Buddhist approach to needs and wants.
5.7 The Appicchatā and Contentment
The Buddhist tradition emphasizes the quality of "appicchatā" - having few desires. This quality is considered essential for spiritual development and well-being.
The Karaniya Metta Sutta states: "Santussako ca subharo ca" - contented and easy to support. The Buddha told us to live simply with the quality of "Appicchatā." As one scholarly analysis explains, "Buddhist economics proposes that individuals limit or control their own needs to suit the limited natural resources, which is the true goal of Buddhist economics" .
The goal of monks is described as: "Sabba dukkha nissaraṇa nibbāṇa sacchikaraṇatthāya" - "For the sake of escaping all suffering and realizing Nibbana." This goal requires the cultivation of contentment and the reduction of craving.
As Mahatma Gandhi observed, "fewer the NEEDS greater HAPPINESS." This insight captures the Buddhist understanding that genuine well-being comes not from satisfying unlimited wants but from reducing desires to what is truly necessary.
5.8 The Lay Buddhist Perspective
While monastics are encouraged to live with minimal possessions, lay Buddhists are given more latitude in managing their wealth. However, the same principles of contentment and moderation apply.
The Buddha advised lay disciples to avoid excessive accumulation and practice generosity. As one analysis explains, "When it comes to money, Buddhists should weigh their 'needs' against 'wants,' instead of treating money as the sole purpose of life" .
The Buddha also advised lay disciples to allocate their income properly. As the Sigalovada Sutta teaches, one's wealth should be divided into four parts: one part for living expenses, one part for business capital, one part for savings, and one part for giving.
This guidance helps lay practitioners balance their material needs with their spiritual aspirations. By recognizing the distinction between needs and wants, lay Buddhists can cultivate contentment while fulfilling their responsibilities.
5.9 The Middle Way and Consumption
The Buddha's teaching of the Middle Way applies to consumption as well as other aspects of life. The Middle Way avoids the extremes of asceticism and indulgence. In the context of consumption, it means neither denying genuine needs nor indulging in unnecessary wants.
As one scholarly analysis explains, "Buddhist economics strives for a holistic outcome and evaluates a policy by how much it minimizes suffering" . This approach emphasizes the satisfaction of genuine needs while minimizing unnecessary wants.
The cultivation of contentment is central to the Middle Way. As one scholar observes, "The idea of a 'person', who is the decisive bearer of rights in the Western concept of human rights, can be read as an illusion to be overcome" . Similarly, the idea that unlimited wants should be satisfied is an illusion to be overcome through wisdom and practice.
---
## 6. Conclusion
The Buddhist perspective on needs and wants offers a profound and practical framework for understanding the relationship between material necessities, desires, and human flourishing. Through systematic analysis of canonical texts, commentarial literature, and contemporary scholarship, this investigation has revealed the distinctive features of the Buddhist approach.
The Buddhist tradition distinguishes between genuine needs and unnecessary wants. The four basic requisites - almsfood, robes, shelter, and medicine - represent the minimum material conditions necessary for human life and spiritual practice. All other desires are wants that should be minimized through the cultivation of contentment.
The distinction between chanda (wholesome desire) and tanha (unwholesome craving) is central to the Buddhist perspective. Needs can be met through chanda when approached with the right intention. Wants, however, are often driven by tanha and should be reduced. The goal of Buddhist practice is not to eliminate all desires but to transform them into wholesome aspirations for well-being and liberation.
As Mahatma Gandhi observed, "Here in this world we can find everything for our NEEDS but not for our GREED" and "fewer the NEEDS greater HAPPINESS." These words capture the essence of the Buddhist perspective. True well-being comes not from satisfying unlimited wants but from reducing desires to what is truly necessary.
All human beings should practice the distinction between needs and wants. As this article has shown, it is very important to know and understand how to have enough wisdom to distinguish what is necessary and how much we barely need. We must use natural resources to fulfill our basic needs with the proper intention and understanding.
In the increasingly globalized world today, the Buddhist perspective on needs and wants offers a viable alternative to the consumerist paradigm. By emphasizing the distinction between needs and wants, Buddhism provides a path to genuine well-being that does not require endless consumption or environmental degradation. As one scholar notes, "Buddhist economics urges individuals not to multiply human desires but to simplify them to be closer to the minimum material comfort" . This is the true wisdom of the Buddhist approach to needs and wants.
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Aggañña Sutta. Digha Nikaya.
Anguttara Nikaya. Kula Sutta. Vol. 4.255. PTS: A. II 249.
Cula-tanhaskkhaya Sutta. Majjhima Nikaya.
Dhaniya Sutta. Sutta Nipata. Sn 1.2. PTS: 18-34.
Karaniya Metta Sutta. Sutta Nipata. Sn 1.8. PTS: 143-152.
Mahāparinibbāna Sutta. Digha Nikaya. PTS: D ii 137. Chapters 5-6.
Mahāvagga Pali. Mahākhandaka.
Sigalovada Sutta. Digha Nikaya. Vol. II, pp. 302.
Secondary Sources
"Commonly Asked Questions about the Buddhist Perspective on Wealth." Dharma Drum Mountain. https://ddmenglish.ddm.org.tw/portal_d8_cnt_page.php?folder_id=62&cnt_id=283&up_page=1.
Maha, Yothin. "The Goals of Buddhist Economics." Journal of Management and Local Innovation, 2023. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmli/article/view/260017.
"The Significance of the Dhaniya Sutta." The Maha Bodhi, Vol. 65, No. 1-12, Jan-Dec 1957. https://ia802905.us.archive.org/34/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.99896/2015.99896.The-Maha--Bodhivol65no1-12jan-dec_text.pdf.
"MN 135 Cula Kammavibhanga Sutta." Dhamma Wiki, 2010. https://www.dhammawiki.com/index.php?title=MN_135_Cula_kammavibhanga_Sutta.
Reinert, Kenneth A. "The Wisdom of Need." Journal of Buddhist Ethics, Vol. 23.
"Snake, Rhino and Bharadvaja Suttas." Free Buddhist Audio, Seminar Texts. https://www.freebuddhistaudio.com/texts/seminartexts/SEM119_Pali_Canon_-_Snake_Rhino_and_Bharadvaja_Suttas.pdf.
"When the Palace Shook: A Lesson on Radical Letting Go from the King of Gods (Cula-tanhaskkhaya Sutta)." Office of Information Technology, Office of the Supreme Patriarch of Thailand, 2026. https://it.gongtham.net/2026/01/04/cula-tanhaskkhaya-sutta-letting-go-lesson-2/.
"A Buddhist's View on Economic Problems." Korean Citation Index, 2025. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001938558.
Zsolnai, Laszlo. "Buddhism and Economic Development." In Teaching Buddhism: New Insights on Understanding and Presenting the Traditions, edited by Todd Lewis and Gary deAngelis. Oxford University Press, 2016.
"Sutta Nipata: The Sutta Collection." Access to Insight. https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/kn/snp/index.html.
Wickramasinghe, Prof. J.W. Introduction to Buddhist Theory of Development Economics (People Friendly Economic Development). Dharmavijaya Foundation, 2 Jan 2000.
http://frugalliving.about.com/od/frugalliving101/qt/Wants_vs_Needs.htm. Accessed 21 July 2013.
http://www.mcwdn.org/ECONOMICS/NeedWant.html. Accessed 21 July 2013.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/vin/mv. Accessed 21 July 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment